Subject:
|
Re: Max-picking LIDAR
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Mar 2004 16:17:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1246 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Brian Davis wrote:
<SNIP>
> No, I did not! How do you do that? Not only might that reduce power
> consumption & decrease cycle time, but...
>
> > ...a couple of FFs (or 00s - whichever causes continuous
> > transmission of bits)...
>
> ...would make it much easier to ensure a maximum reading! Where can I find
> documentation on this? For that matter, does anyone know where I could get the
> most up-to-date NQC guide? Since the web page moved, the guides seem to have
> vanished (& I've only got the 2.3 guide).
>
> > As an observation, two Sumo bots doing this kind of detection
> > would cause some interesting results wouldn't they :)
<SNIP>
Brian, thanks for posting this...I can't wait to try it out :)
As for formatting your own messages in RCX 2.0 you can look at our (LRGoAA)
communication protocol functions put together by Paul Haas for the robotic
soccer event. Here is a link to the download file:
http://www.24tooth.com/Files/Soccer-bot/Soccer-bot.zip. I don't know about
documentation for NQC so much, but this is an example of how to do it.
Jona
http://www.24tooth.com - LEGO Robotics Group of Ann Arbor
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Max-picking LIDAR
|
| (...) Yes. Here's a more complete test program, that comes close to duplicating my original performance. Just download, & attach a forward-facing light sensor to IN_2: #define eye SENSOR_2 int reflect; task main() { SetSensor(eye, SENSOR_LIGHT); (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
