Subject:
|
Re: replacement for IR-communication
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:31:50 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
nanobapt@wanadoo.frANTISPAM
|
Viewed:
|
1131 times
|
| |
| |
that's not really hard .... Tx is the IR del ans Rx is the TSOP 1838 ...
For tsop there is a GND, +5V and data (here Rx, see datasheet to know
which pins use)
There is no over pin to use cause you can send only one data by this way
....
nanobapt
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 15:42, Thomas Kronschläger wrote:
> Hello !
>
> I'm trying to replace the IR - communication interface of the RCX by
> a bluetooth module, because IR is too slow for my application (
> navigation system with real - time transmission).
> The only way I can connect the RCX to the module is via the serial
> port of the H8 microcontroller.
> Now I wanted to ask, if anybody of you has any experience with
> replacing the IR - interface or if someone knows, which pins
> of the microcontroller are used for the serial port.
>
> Greetings,
> Tom
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: replacement for IR-communication
|
| If it is so easy to change the send/receive method on the RCX, why hasn't someone already done it? My thought was to figure out how the Cybermaster RF components could be used on the rcx instead of the RCX's IR. I would absolutely love to see (...) (21 years ago, 29-Sep-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | replacement for IR-communication
|
| Hello ! I'm trying to replace the IR - communication interface of the RCX by a bluetooth module, because IR is too slow for my application ( navigation system with real - time transmission). The only way I can connect the RCX to the module is via (...) (21 years ago, 29-Sep-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|