Subject:
|
Re: RCX 2.0 -- ideas.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Jan 1999 17:18:44 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
"Keith Miller" <kmiller@talon.net>
|
Viewed:
|
1206 times
|
| |
|
|
hrmms.. I dunno.. It's a interesting Idea..
Sometimes I think I could use a few more switch inputs..
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Hesketh <pbh@phesk.demon.co.uk>
To: lego-robotics@crynwr.com <lego-robotics@crynwr.com>
Date: Friday, January 01, 1999 11:54 AM
Subject: RCX 2.0 -- ideas.
> In article <4.1.19990101123359.00945d30@mail.telepac.pt>, Laurentino
> Martins <lau@mail.telepac.pt> writes
> > I personally know how good I am at destroying hardware. Is not uncommon to • try
> > to fix something and ending up destroying it even further, specially when • a
> > soldering iron is involved.
> > More that 3 sensor inputs should be accessible to everybody, not only to • an
> > elite.
>
> Would it be worth my while to make some 4-into-one adaptor bricks and
> offer them for sale?
>
> It would consist of an 8 x 2 peg brick (for 4 bump sensors) with a
> flying lead to a 2 x 2 hole brick which would plug into a single RCX
> input.
>
> How many would people want, and how much would you pay?
> --
> Regards - Peter Hesketh, Mynyddbach, Mon.
> Forty reasons why a dog is better than a woman: number 15
> "Dogs don't shop."
> --
> Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
