Subject:
|
Re: COG shifter off topic
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 May 2003 23:22:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
864 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, tony.burton@engineer.com writes:
> I presume you realise that COG and centroid are only equivalent for a body
> of uniform density?
In my case, you presume wrong! Is COG more correct then given that uCOG V
is not of uniform density?
Kevin
>
> Tony
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway@lugnet.com]On Behalf
> Of Kevin L. Clague
> Sent: Wednesday, 14 May 2003 4:32 a.m.
> To: lego-robotics@crynwr.com
> Subject: Re: COG shifter off topic
>
>
> In lugnet.technic, Kevin L. Clague writes:
> > In lugnet.technic, Paul Kleniewski writes:
> > > hi ppl
> > >
> > > are we using COG TLA cause we like TLAs
> > > or because we differ COG and centroid?
> >
> > I used it because it is commonly used here, and because it is short.
>
> Besides, Mario and Giulio Ferrari use the term in their book, so it is
> good
> enough for me :^)
>
> Kevin
>
> >
> > >
> > > btw i like TLAs so COG is cool
> > >
> > > pixel
> >
> > Kevin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | RE: COG shifter off topic
|
| I presume you realise that COG and centroid are only equivalent for a body of uniform density? Tony -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...net.com]On Behalf Of Kevin L. Clague Sent: Wednesday, 14 May 2003 (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
