Subject:
|
RE: COG shifter off topic
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 May 2003 20:15:45 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Tony Burton <t.burton@mech+AvoidSpam+.canterbury.ac.nz>
|
Reply-To:
|
tony.burton@engineer.ANTISPAMcom
|
Viewed:
|
829 times
|
| |
|
|
I presume you realise that COG and centroid are only equivalent for a body
of uniform density?
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway@lugnet.com]On Behalf
Of Kevin L. Clague
Sent: Wednesday, 14 May 2003 4:32 a.m.
To: lego-robotics@crynwr.com
Subject: Re: COG shifter off topic
In lugnet.technic, Kevin L. Clague writes:
> In lugnet.technic, Paul Kleniewski writes:
> > hi ppl
> >
> > are we using COG TLA cause we like TLAs
> > or because we differ COG and centroid?
>
> I used it because it is commonly used here, and because it is short.
Besides, Mario and Giulio Ferrari use the term in their book, so it is
good
enough for me :^)
Kevin
>
> >
> > btw i like TLAs so COG is cool
> >
> > pixel
>
> Kevin
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: COG shifter off topic
|
| Can anybody explain to me what a "Centroid" is? I know what a COG is, here in this groups it means a robot that moves the center of gravity to hold the balance when walking (?). "Tony Burton" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message (...) (22 years ago, 15-May-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
