Subject:
|
Re: legway :only lego parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 01:19:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
654 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <3E63F5B8.2040108@airmail.net>,
Steve Baker <sjbaker1@airmail.net> wrote:
> Hmmm - so it looks like the solution to the "Lego sensor isn't
> sensitive enough" problem with the Legway has been simply (if a
> little un-prettily) solved by sticking it out on a long arm to
> magnify the amount it moves when the robot tilts.
From the pictures it looked like the "solution" was to place an
out-rigger on it to keep it from falling over.
--
DON'T PAY MORE FOR WEB HOSTING THAN WHAT YOU WANT TO PAY
At Full System, Inc. you invent the package *and* the price!
Point your browser to http://custom.fullsystem.com/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: legway :only lego parts
|
| (...) There were other contributions to his solution. 1. Reading the babelfish translation (babelfish.altavista.com), I note that he used a non-Lego part to increase the amount of light reflected to the sensor. 2. He used a freely pivoting weight, (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: legway :only lego parts
|
| (...) problem with the Legway has been simply (if a little un-prettily) solved by sticking it out on a long arm to magnify the amount it moves when the robot tilts. Seems like that ought to work pretty well. I wonder whether the arm really needs to (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
