To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 20207
20206  |  20208
Subject: 
Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory? - Advanced alternatives: JCX, Embedlets
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Sat, 1 Feb 2003 18:54:18 GMT
Original-From: 
Bruce Boyes <bboyes@systronix^AntiSpam^.com>
Viewed: 
1524 times
  
Quoting PeterBalch <PeterBalch@compuserve.com>:

Bruce

We don't plan an enclosure per se, at least not now, but will use Lego

tiles glued to the base of the backplane:

Did you have to get Lego's permission to do that? Do they mind if you
do
it? Do they know?

I don't know why we would need anyone's permission to purchase their
product and use it. You're welcome to buy any publicly available
commercial parts and combine them into a product for sale (after all
that's why the suppliers sell them). This is the basis of most
manufacturing businesses.

Bruce


Peter



RealTime Embedded Java



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory? - Advanced alternatives: JCX, Embedlets
 
(...) Hey, that's exactly what the Bricksmiths people are doing: (URL) C S Soh CSSoh's Lego Pneumatics (URL) where air is power! (22 years ago, 2-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory? - Advanced alternatives: JCX, Embedlets
 
Bruce (...) Did you have to get Lego's permission to do that? Do they mind if you do it? Do they know? Peter (22 years ago, 1-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR