 | | Re: Tempted in buying my first Mindstorms invention kit - 1.5 vs 2.0 ? —David Schilling
|
| | | (...) Actually I've noticed that the 2.0 brick's IR capabilities don't seem to be as strong as the 1.0/1.5 bricks. I don't know why this would be, if something got changed in the hardware? It isn't an issue for most things, but if you want bricks (...) (22 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Tempted in buying my first Mindstorms invention kit - 1.5 vs 2.0 ? —Jeff Wood
|
| | | | | I have one of each RCX (1.0, 1.5 , 2.0) and have tested the signals using a palm app called IRMonitor with little or no difference between the three. This is by no means a "labratory test". Haveyou noticed this with more than one brick? For the (...) (22 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Tempted in buying my first Mindstorms invention kit - 1.5 vs 2.0 ? —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | | I have not performed any tests, but if you go in configuration panel, you will see that the USB tower can't be put in long range mode if it is placed behind a passive (non powered) USB hub. That may also be the case for low power laptop usb ports. (...) (22 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Tempted in buying my first Mindstorms invention kit - 1.5 vs 2.0 ? —Matthias Jetleb
|
| | | | I have observed a bit of sloppiness in the manufacture of the RCX's such that, in some cases, the IR diodes aren't mounted perfectly horizontally, they may be at an angle which will affect the apparent range. Opening the case and re-aligning the (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
