Subject:
|
Re: Shufflebot Concept
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Dec 2002 22:12:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1090 times
|
| |
|
|
The problem with that is you'd have to put the mechanisms together by
putting axles over the first setup, which begins looking ugly. This is how I
achieved the first walking part:
1. Geared down motor going to two output axles.
2. Put two pulleys on output axles.
3. Connected a 1x16 Beam w/ holes to the two pulleys with 1 - 1/2 pin.
This creates a wondeful motion, but if you can have another leg on the same
side come down when the other is going up, you increase the speed. Adding a
third increases it even more. You would not suffer much torque loss, because
only one beam will be touching the floor and moving the robot forward at a
time. Hope i didn't confuse you guys :)
>
> Well, if you can do one, how about if you put two of these right next to
> each other? I'm sure you'd want one to be a mirror of the other, to put
> them closer together...
>
> I don't know if three would work as well.
>
> Maybe you could have one that's stationary, and two that move (one on each
side)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Shufflebot Concept
|
| (...) Well, if you can do one, how about if you put two of these right next to each other? I'm sure you'd want one to be a mirror of the other, to put them closer together... I don't know if three would work as well. Maybe you could have one that's (...) (22 years ago, 13-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
