Subject:
|
RE: "real" LEGO Hovercraft ? (with/without batteries/RCX "onboard")
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:17:44 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Marco Correia <marco@^AvoidSpam^soporcel.pt>
|
Reply-To:
|
<marco@soporcel.*stopspammers*pt>
|
Viewed:
|
872 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi Andy :)
> You may be able to get the power/weight ratio by gearing the
> motor very
> high, and using a non-Lego propeller. The propeller would be able to
> generate a large amount of lift, allowing a light structure
> to get off the
> ground.
Well... I tried last night various solutions, with the two types of motors,
gearing, LEGO (useless) and non-LEGO propellers and... the best I could do
was a contraption that only lifted with a counter-weight (something like the
pseudo-helicopter solution discussed on another thread).
so... after these tests, I think I've found a possible motor (the "old"
non-geared one) + non-LEGO propeller to start with. I'm partly convinced
that it won't work, but... that's the beauty of experimentation. Maybe it
can prove me wrong :)
Anyway, next I'll try to channel/concentrate the air flow through something
like a funnel that could be used to create a delimited air cushion.
....maybe I'll use (first) a quick ZNAP frame with the plastic film that I
talked earlier, kinda like a draft of the contraption. If it works, I'll try
doing it with Technic.
mc.
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
