 | | Re: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ? —Steve Baker
|
| | | (...) I think we all agree on that point - a more modular computer with as few limits on expandability as the technology can manage. RCX is OK - but you immediately run into three problems: 1) Not enough motor and sensor ports. No matter how many (...) (23 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | RE: Lego Technic: R.I.P. ? —Marco Correia
|
| | | | | (...) Yep. (...) Yep. At least, separate the CPU power supply from the motor output power supply. We already have those power supply boxes: the 6xAA or 1x9V batt box :) (...) Yep again :) IR's ok for local, short range comms... but radio is a must. (...) (23 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Modular advanced RCX - yes, it's called JCX —Bruce Boyes
|
| | | | (...) Well, that's the idea behind JCX ((URL) which has now been in beta test for over a year. We are nearing the final stretch and hope to release early 2003. A student class at the University of Utah is using them, here's a link to the team page: (...) (23 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
