 | | RE: Another update for WIRRL —Rob Limbaugh
|
| | | Just in case people are a bit confused by the schematic, the circuit would be needed for each device that will participate in an RF bridge. I abandoned the idea of using two different frequencies because: 1) As soon as you attempt communication (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Another update for WIRRL —Timothy Schroeder
|
| | | | What's a "proxy messenger"? Couldn't the reflection problem be solved by placing a barrier in between the emitter and receiver? Timothy (...) (22 years ago, 22-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Another update for WIRRL —Rob Limbaugh
|
| | | | I should have removed the word "messenger". After all, doing something by "proxy" would imply a messenger-type role. What I meant was, for DeviceA to send a message to DeviceB, they would have to use some sort of proxy or router between them (the (...) (22 years ago, 23-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
