 | | Re: Mindstorms Bleak Future - Bah! Purism Shmurism!
|
|
(...) (I made this up) - a computer which accepts Lego I/O devices (sensors and motors). This includes both passive and active sensors. (...) More like this: keep the mechanics of the house you have and we'll add new network wiring and a smart home (...) (22 years ago, 9-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Mindstorms Bleak Future - Bah! Purism Shmurism!
|
|
(...) So a Scout isn't a Lego compatible computer? ---...--- Steve Baker ---...--- Mail : <sjbaker1@airmail.net> WorkMail: <sjbaker@link.com> URLs : (8 URLs) (22 years ago, 9-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | "Lego Compatible" was Re: Mindstorms Bleak Future - Bah! Purism Shmurism!
|
|
(...) If a 'computer' accepts the unmodified plug-on Lego sensors and motors then (by my definition) it's Lego-compatible. Bruce (22 years ago, 9-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: "Lego Compatible" was Re: Mindstorms Bleak Future - Bah! Purism Shmurism!
|
|
(...) No - you said it has to work with the active sensors and the Scout only works with passive sensors. I was just being facetious - it's been a long hard day today. ---...--- Steve Baker ---...--- Mail : <sjbaker1@airmail.net> WorkMail: (...) (22 years ago, 9-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: "Lego Compatible"
|
|
(...) Right, it needs to work with standard Lego sensors (of whatever kind). So by my definition then the Scout is only partially compatible. Bruce (22 years ago, 9-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: "Lego Compatible" was Re: Mindstorms Bleak Future - Bah! Purism Shmurism!
|
|
(...) No, you were being pedantic. A vice to which I've never fallen myself... :o) Elijah (22 years ago, 9-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
