 | | Re: lugnet.robotics.spybotics? —Rob Doucette
|
| | | (...) Yes, although I think the question is "is there an interest in *not* having Spybotics discussions in the main .robotics or .general groups?" -Rob. (22 years ago, 26-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: lugnet.robotics.spybotics? — Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | (...) Following form, it belongs alongside RCX, under .robotics. My fear actually was that a group's creation isn't warranted - that we create it for something thats attention is short-lived. But with what I just read Dave is up to, it seems (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: lugnet.robotics.spybotics? —David Koudys
|
| | | | | In lugnet.robotics, Suzanne D. Rich writes: <snip> (...) I dunno if this is official enough for you, but they have the Spybotics listed under Mindstorms on the S@H page. I'm at work now so the box my Gigamesh came in is nowhere near me, and I threw (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: lugnet.robotics.spybotics? —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | (...) From the box picture on LEGO's site does not have Mindstorms on it in any noticable way. It is a LEGO logo with Spybotics in big letters. Jude (22 years ago, 26-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
