 | | Re: "Servo" Driver for NQC —Jerry Kalpin
|
| | | (...) <snip> (...) Right, but in the firmware PWM, it is 'on-float-on-float' not 'on-brake-on-brake' I think (but I'm not sure). In fact, the 'on-brake-on-brake' is a neat way to get fine control to (say) just crack a pneumatic valve to move a (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: "Servo" Driver for NQC —Dick Swan
|
| | | | This is a long post. It covers the following: 1. How the "WAIT x 10 msec" opcode is implemented and its inherent inaccuracy for low delays. And suggests an alternative code implementation 2. How RCX motor PWM is implemented. And the implication that (...) (23 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Servo" Driver for NQC —Jerry Kalpin
|
| | | | | <snip> (...) <snip> (...) Really good post! Just a loose end: If you press the 'stop' button on the RCX while a motor is running the motor stops in the 'brake' condition. If you connect a spare motor to a gray battery box with the switch in a (...) (23 years ago, 31-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Servo" Driver for NQC —Iain Hendry
|
| | | | "Dick Swan" <dickswan@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:GqsAv4.GL1@lugnet.com... (...) <snip> Dick, let me first say thank you for the post. I've implemented some of your suggestions and my robot has gone from unuseable to operating as I had (...) (23 years ago, 1-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
