To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 17009
17008  |  17010
Subject: 
Re: Inertial guidance
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Sat, 12 Jan 2002 18:28:23 GMT
Viewed: 
2846 times
  
In lugnet.robotics, sjbaker1@airmail.net writes:
> Ian Warfield wrote:
> > 
> > In lugnet.robotics, Pete Sevcik writes:
> > > Has anyone tried to do inertial guidance with the RCX ?
> > 
> > Uh, how do you mean?  Inertia pretty much guides itself, unless you want to
> > abolish Newton's First Law...?
> 
> The term "inertial guidance" refers to a navigational technique that involves
> carefully measuring the rotational and translational accelleration of the
> vehicle, then integrating that to derive the velocity and integrating *that*
> to get the vehicles position.
> 
> The big problem with inertial guidance is precision.  If you make even a
> tiny error in measuring accelleration, that will add up over time to create
> a larger error in your velocity - which in turn adds up over time to make
> for huge positional errors.
> 
> It's generally useful to use inertial navigation only when you can
> periodically reset the error by reference to some absolute positioning
> cue.  It's not generally a good idea to use inertial guidance on systems
> that can be the victims of impact forces - since those induce very large
> accellerations for very short amounts of time - those are almost impossible
> to measure with enough precision.  Hence, the technique is mostly used on
> aircraft, missiles and spacecraft (where you don't expect to hit anything!)
> 
> You also generally need six sensors in order to measure the accellerations
> in all six degrees of freedom -  that's not gonna be nice for an RCX!

Ah, I see.  Thanks for your explanation.

How would one make inertial sensors for the RCX anyway?  I suppose you could
rig a plumb bob to a rotation sensor - but as you had already pointed out,
rotation sensors are inaccurate at low rotation speeds.  Hmm...

--Ian



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Inertial guidance
 
I am developing a two axis acceleration sensor that is RCX compatible. Unfortunately, that by itself is not sufficient for inertial navigation in a fixed plane. (i.e. a robot that stays on the floor) A fully inertial system would need a rotational (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Inertial guidance
 
(...) The term "inertial guidance" refers to a navigational technique that involves carefully measuring the rotational and translational accelleration of the vehicle, then integrating that to derive the velocity and integrating *that* to get the (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics)

9 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR