Subject:
|
Fwd: FW: Social Security
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 14:39:41 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
kristin fullenwider <rudies2piecesuit@hotmail+NoSpam+.com>
|
Viewed:
|
1063 times
|
| |
|
|
> From: Matthew.Siewert@VerizonWireless.com
> To: sbaker1@se.verizonwireless.com, BBlack@se.verizonwireless.com,
> MDegele@se.verizonwireless.com, BEickhol@se.verizonwireless.com,
> SHall@se.verizonwireless.com, PLee@se.verizonwireless.com,
> RMiller1@se.verizonwireless.com, ANicolet@se.verizonwireless.com,
> obranch1@tampabay.rr.com, patrycja@aubrey-organics.com,
> KPerez@se.verizonwireless.com, CPetros@se.verizonwireless.com,
> NRodrigu@se.verizonwireless.com, RUDIES2PIECESUIT@HOTMAIL.COM,
> MATTHEW_SIEWERT@HOTMAIL.COM, EStrom@se.verizonwireless.com,
> TCarlson@dickinson-wright.com, SValdes@se.verizonwireless.com
> CC: mvertigo75@cs.com
> Subject: FW: Social Security
> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:46:57 -0500
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carrie Griffith [mailto:carriegriffith@gmmediaworks.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 12:14 PM
> To: 'Bill Griffith (E-mail 2)'; 'Jeni Snelling (E-mail) (E-mail)';
> 'Josephina Collica (E-mail)'; 'Julie Collard (E-mail)'; 'Kathy Griffith
> (E-mail)'; 'Krissy Spry (E-mail)'; 'Matthew. Siewert (E-mail)'; 'Melanie
> Frohriep (E-mail)'; 'Melanie Hazelton (E-mail)'; 'Michelle Abdallah
> (E-mail)'; 'Michelle Montalto (E-mail)'; 'Pfront24@home. com (E-mail)';
> 'Theresa Raulerson (E-mail)'; 'Tiffanie Norris (Kern) (E-mail)'
> Subject: FW: Social Security
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric B. Boughner [mailto:boughne8@msu.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:58 AM
> To: william.f.sheets@gm.com; Stepulla, Joseph AECO; shelby feldpausch;
> Ronei Foumia; Plawecki, Brent (D.); paula.disalvo@gm.com; Paul VanDam;
> Minerva Gebara; mike.unger@gm.com; Michael J Ruchti;
> meiling1@pilot.msu.edu; mark.e.donaldson@gm.com; Luke A Jones; Lisa
> Murphy; kathryn.baumgartner@gm.com; jvogel@cecom.com;
> joseph.jernigan@gm.com; Joe Pikur; Jim Lung (E-mail); Faith; Evan Vander
> Eyk; ed.m.flanagan@gm.com; cvanhartesvelt@walbridge.com;
> chris.hornberger@gm.com; Chad Hepner; Brian LeRoy; Boughner, Jackie;
> benjamin.pettit@gm.com; Aunt Lou; dan.hall@gm.com
> Subject: Fw: Social Security
>
>
>
> Subject: Social Security
>
>
> This is pretty interesting, and I think we should do something about
> it....
>
> Eric.
>
>
> > Social Security
>
> > Perhaps we were asking the wrong questions in this past election year.
> >
> > Our Senators/Congressmen do not pay into Social Security, and,
> > therefore they do not collect from it. Social Security benefits were • not
> > suitable for them.
> >
> > They felt they should have a special plan. Many years ago they
> > voted in their benefit plan. In more recent years, no congress
> > person has felt the need to change it. After all, it is a great plan.
> >
> > For all practical purposes, their plan works like this:
> >
> > When they retire no matter how long they have been in office,
> > they continue to draw their same pay until they die, except it may
> > be increased from time to time by the cost-of-living adjustments.
> > For example, former Senator Bill Bradley (New Jersey) and his
> > wife may be expected to draw $7,900,000.00 over an average
> > life span, with Mrs. Bradley drawing $275,000.00 during the last
> > year of her life. Their cost for this excellent plan is "0," nada,
> > zilch. This little perk they voted in for themselves is free to them.
> >
> > You and I pick up the tab for this plan. Our tax dollars at work!
> > Social Security, which you and I pay into every payday for our
> > own retirement, with an equal amount paid in by our employer,
> > we can expect to receive an average of $1,000 per month. We
> > would have to collect our benefits for 68 years and 1 month to
> > equal the Bradley's benefits.
> >
> > Imagine for a moment that you could structure a retirement
> > plan so desirable, a retirement plan that worked so well, that
> > Railroad Employees, Postal Workers, and others who were
> > not in the plan would clamor to be included. This is how good
> > Social Security could be, if only one small change was made.
> >
> > That change would be to jerk the Golden Fleece Retirement
> > Plan out from under the Senators & Congressmen. Put them
> > into the Social Security plan with the rest of us. Watch how
> > fast they fix it!!!
> >
> > If enough people receive this message maybe a seed will
> > be planted, and maybe good changes will evolve.
> >
> > Don't forget, our girl, Hillary Rodham Clinton, now comes
> > under this Congressional Retirement Plan. Talking about
> > the Clinton's, it's common knowledge that, in order for her to
> > establish NYC residency, they purchased a million + house
> > in upscale Chappaqua, NY. Makes sense.
> >
> > Now, they are entitled to Secret Service protection for life.
> > Still makes sense. Here is where it becomes interesting.
> >
> > A residency had to be built in order to house the Secret
> > Service agents. The Clinton's now charge the Secret
> > Service rent for the use of said residence and that rent is
> > just about equal to their mortgage payment, meaning that
> > we, the tax payers, are paying the Clinton's mortgage,
> > and it's all perfectly legal.
> >
> > How many people can YOU send this to?
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. Click Here
>
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Fwd: FW: Social Security
|
| (...) I fail to see how this relates to Lugnet.Robots. A more appropriate spot would be Lugnet.offtopic.geek. (perhaps) Thanks... Benjamin Medinets (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
