 | | RE: About firmwares —Nathan Nesbit
|
| | | (...) Why is it easier to debug? How would you compare Lejos with NQC in ease of debugging. -----Original Message----- From: Juergen Stuber [mailto:stuber@loria.fr] Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 12:22 AM To: lego-robotics@crynwr.com Subject: Re: (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: About firmwares —Steve Baker
|
| | | | | (...) (I've never used LejOS but...) With LegOS (and I would imagine with LejOS), the advantage is over NQC is that the language you are programming in is a standard implementation. Hence, you can compile your program with the specialised calls for (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: About firmwares —Juergen Stuber
|
| | | | (...) Mostly because Java is a safer language than C, there are a lot of programming errors in C that you can't make in Java. And if there's a runtime error in Lejos you get a nice exception, with your firmware still alive. When I tried legOS 1 1/2 (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
