 | | Re: About firmwares —Steve Baker
|
| | | (...) That's what I'd expect. (...) Yes - I doubt that you really *need* all that performance on something like a Lego robot - particularly given the relatively limited amount of memory in the beast. (...) Just to clarify: NQC isn't "firmware" - it (...) (23 years ago, 20-Oct-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: About firmwares —Juergen Stuber
|
| | | | (...) Yes, it's easier to use than Lejos, no doubt about it. (...) I think it's "not quite" in the control structures but "very little" in the data structures. (...) It's not that hard to replace the firmware, and with the Lejos firmware you get a (...) (23 years ago, 21-Oct-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: About firmwares —Steve Baker
|
| | | | (...) Yes...and no...the control structures (which include parallelism) are somewhat more than C has in *some* ways - but you are certainly right about data structures - which are limited to 16 bit integers and (with version 2.x firmware) small (...) (23 years ago, 22-Oct-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: About firmwares —Juergen Stuber
|
| | | | (...) Yes. (...) Yes, I did that too. (...) I'd make that Lejos, and LegOS only if I need that last bit of performance, and I have a lot of time for programming. Jürgen (23 years ago, 23-Oct-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
