To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 15332
15331  |  15333
Subject: 
Re: Ir and proximity detection
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Wed, 2 May 2001 15:01:20 GMT
Original-From: 
Simon_Jensen-Fellows@avid.+spamless+com
Viewed: 
456 times
  
Hi everyone,
We in Toronto are going to be having another robotics competition soon. Our
new rules allow for multiple Rcx robots. This means that they will have to send
IR signals back and forth to communicate. Unfortunately, I was really wanting
to do proximity detection with my sinlge rcx robot. Since the other robot(s)
will be blasting IR all over the place to communicate, I'm assuming my robot
would be seeing reflections of their IR as well as its own signals. Sounds like
a big mess:( Is there any way to program the light sensor to respond only to a
certain frequency of IR? In the mess of IR bouncing all over the place, could
I filter out my signal somehow? Or will I have to resort to bumpers and just
stupidly bumping into walls like before??

No you can't tune the frequency of the IR. Although with two RCXs you could use
the
comms IR to look for reflected packets with specific content. However, do you
want
o avoid or attack other robots ? If it's avoid, then you don't have a problem,
you'd
want to avoid stray IR just as much as reflected.

If it's attack, then with a well thought out algorithm, you could avoid
reflections
and attack direct signals. There are a couple of ways of doing this:
thresholding might
work: below a certain value it's a reflection, above another is another robot.
Mechanically
or electrically blocking and unblocking the IR would let you know if it is your
IR or not.
This probably doesn't even have to be perfect, 25% accuracy in spotting another
robot
for attack is better than 0%.

-Simon



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Ir and proximity detection
 
(...) to send (...) wanting (...) Sounds like (...) to a (...) could (...) Is the Lego timer good enough to use time division multiplexing, assuming the other robots are yours and you can synchronize them. We're hoping to use this with our jcx (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.robotics)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR