 | | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but... —Steve Lane
|
| | | (...) I am right, you are wrong. Steve And my implementation would be a lot easier to build and operate. (24 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but... —Mike Fusion
|
| | | | "Steven Lane" <Steveroblane@aol.com> wrote in message news:GCEo0r.L5v@lugnet.com... (...) i believe that with the string not being held at one end there would either be little or no twisting when the string was reeled in if spooled with an open end (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but... —Steve Lane
|
| | | | (...) Mikes right winding the thread onto the spool neatly and keeping it neat and tight would be the vital factor for correct operation. Of course once the dart had returned and locked into place that would keep the thread tight on the spool. Steve (24 years ago, 29-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
