 | | Re: Rotational Sensor & Gearing Down
|
|
"Steve Baker" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message news:3A6EFF8A.416F3D...ail.net... (...) Nice post, but you only ran the sensors counting up for x number of seconds. Try *reversing*. Then watch what happens... (IE, bring a sensor back home. (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Rotational Sensor & Gearing Down
|
|
Thanks to all for the good information that has been related here. Most of my applications were low rpm which seems to be a definite fault area. I like to use them for absolute programming of positions. I now see the problem in using them in these (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Rotational Sensor & Gearing Down
|
|
(...) Just don't go past it's Max or Min areas or you'll have a problem. This is probably a good place for the white slip gear... Dean -- Coin-Op's For Sale!: (URL) Lego Workshop: (URL) Lego Club: (URL) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Rotational Sensor & Gearing Down
|
|
(...) I just read the very interesting posting regarding testing the rotation sensor to evaluate the "missing counts" phenomenon. The above snippit would indicate that the rotation sensor is handled differently from other sensors. It isn't! It is (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: CM-RCX comm
|
|
(...) Ok, one of many possible examples (we're talking about Lego, where your imagination is your limit... err... well, almost ;) I could use an input port of a RCX as a 4th motor controller, using VLL through the LED of a LightSensor connected to (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
