To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 13932 (-5)
  Re: Motor mis-match.
 
At 09:53 PM 1/14/01 -0600, you wrote: > I was having a boring evening - so I decided to test some theories > about Lego motors - and at the risk of seeming pedantic - here are > my findings: Did you reverse the motors by issuing the "Reverse" (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Motor mis-match.
 
(...) Very nice results! Another interesting thing to measure would be differences of the outputs. If you know these, you can put 3 motors each on its output and by changing the sequence measure whether the slowing down in a series is due to some (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Motor mis-match.
 
Steve Baker writes: > We *need* stepper motors! Noooooooo!!!!!! We need motors like servo motors, where they come in a box, and have a built-in controller. Except that they need to be multi-turn, and you need to be able to say "Measure the angular (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Limit Switches without using sensor inputs
 
Very sharp! A very clever and elegant solution to a common problem. (25 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Motor mis-match.
 
Thank you! I'm glad to see someone has taken a semi-scientific approach to the whole question. I have one correction/comment to make though: It's doubtful that the Lego motors will heat up significantly enough to affect their operating speed. There (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR