Subject:
|
Re: Elimating the need for the IR tower
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:14:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
563 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.robotics, John Barnes writes:
> I traced out the circuitry in the tower a couple of months back
> to make sure it didn't have any clever tricks up its sleeve.
> It doesn't!
> There is a simple timer circuit that keeps the power applied for a certain
> period after the last activity allowing for response data to be received from
> the RCX.
What I'm wondering, is could the timer circuit be eliminated? From previous
posts, I know a lot of people would like to have their towers ready to
recieve at any time, without it shutting down from lack of activity. People
have been adding to their code lines to transmit unneeded messages just to
keep the tower alive. If there were a trace or two we could cut on the
circuit board and still keep it functional, it would be an easy hack.
--Electro--
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Elimating the need for the IR tower
|
| I have been following this thread for a while and it suddenly crossed my mind that the originator of the thread may have had a slightly different requirement than the current thread's interpretation is addressing. I traced out the circuitry in the (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
4 Messages in This Thread: ![Re: Elimating the need for the IR tower -John Barnes (10-Jan-01 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![RE: Elimating the need for the IR tower -Ralph Hempel (10-Jan-01 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Elimating the need for the IR tower -Dean Husby (10-Jan-01 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|