 | | Re: RIS 2.0 content !!! —Kevin McMillin
| | | | (...) Mega Slow? I've got ME and it loads in about 10 seconds. 2000 Professional took about (minutes, seconds)1:30. Kevin (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: RIS 2.0 content !!! —Scott Arthur
| | | | | | (...) Try NT4.0. It is slow - very slow. Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: RIS 2.0 content !!! —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | | (...) Unless you reboot a lot, it's not about how long it takes to load, it's about how long it takes to do common operations. That said, I have no idea how fast ME is on common tasks compared to 2000, but 2000 has been to my perception, a bit (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: RIS 2.0 content !!! —Martin
| | | | | | (...) You should not compare Win95 and its descendants to Windows NT and its descendants. Windows ME is approximately the seventh version of Win9x to be released (Windows 95 OSR 1, 2, and 3 (3 was basically a win98 beta), Windows 98 and 98 SE, and (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: RIS 2.0 content !!! —Dean Husby
| | | | | (...) I meant slow when running, not booting... Dean -- Coin-Op's For Sale!: (URL) Lego Workshop: (URL) Lego Club: (URL) (24 years ago, 14-Dec-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
