Subject:
|
Re:AI in RCX (from proposer)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sun, 5 Nov 2000 05:16:38 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
rch8@NOSPAMcornell.edu
|
Viewed:
|
925 times
|
| |
|
|
Ok! I should NOT have said that programming neural-networks on the RCX
is impossible, and that the only way is to use the PC.
And to Yiu, I would like to say that I had no intention of detering you
from this project. I agree completely with Andy that the goal is to try,
learn and do. And to that note, I wish you the best on this project.
It sounds like there are several people who have had some success
with this approach. I simply wanted to present an incremental
approach - focusing on smaller tasks first.
I apologize for my assumptions and also wish to retract my challenge
that "I will believe it when I see it.". Obviously, there is much more
to learning, playing and doing. These are of course, whole reason for the
existence of Legos.
Rama
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: AI in RCX (from proposer)
|
| rch8 There is no need to apologize as everyone could has his own view. Of course, I understand that you do not have any bad intention. And I believe that there is no "bad" people in our Lego playing groups. Thanks anyway. Yiu (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re:AI in RCX (from proposer)
|
| Dear All (...) Yes, that's why I ask for your advice and help. (...) ultra-sonic sensors, so you would need to provide these yourself. The ultra-sonic sensors are already ready (Thanks to JB). They work similar to a light sensor, give reading from (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
