Subject:
|
Re: need advice on joining....
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 7 Oct 2000 20:59:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
464 times
|
| |
|
|
Use the light gray pegs that have a 1-length dowel on one side and a stud on
the other side. These convert holes to studs, so it is easy to make the joint
you want. Put one stud next to the cross axle hole in the bend angle beam,
skip two holes, and put another stud in the 3rd hole from the axle. If that
isn't strong enough, at least it is a good start for the fastening.
-Amnon
In lugnet.robotics, Chris Magno writes:
> Help
>
> I am building a gripping mechanism and am using pneumatics to do the
> squeezing. Due to the orientation of the hole on the base of the
> cylinder I was "forced" to attach a beam in such a way that is now puts
> me in a bind.
>
> The beam in question lies on its side. At some point the gripper has to
> rotate 90 degree's. the best way I have found to do this (with
> pneumatics) is to attach a single bend angle beam to the gripper.
>
> as seen here:
>
> http://www.members.home.net/magno42/4/page1.htm
>
> does anyone have ideas on how to securely join 2 beams with the holes 90
> degrees to each other.
>
> I've taken a series of shots that might make a bit more sense....
>
> http://www.members.home.net/magno42/4/
>
> I've tried the small grey connectors that turns a hole 90 degree's but
> the angle beam is too wide and it dose not conform with lego math.
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Chris
> Lego Walker now @
> www.members.home.net/cmagno/technics/index.htm
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: need advice on joining....
|
| Amnon: Thanks. Your right. that did the trick. I used your idea in conjunction with a part that I found in the cybermaster set. I just searched the element registry and could not find it. it has 2 friction pegs on the bottom, and forms a triangle (...) (24 years ago, 8-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | need advice on joining....
|
| Help I am building a gripping mechanism and am using pneumatics to do the squeezing. Due to the orientation of the hole on the base of the cylinder I was "forced" to attach a beam in such a way that is now puts me in a bind. The beam in question (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
