 | | Re: How 2 Augment RIS 1.5?
|
|
(...) Lots of technic sets. 84xx series if possible. (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: How 2 Augment RIS 1.5?
|
|
(...) would (...) Bucket", (...) You're much better off with a "Basic" or "Classic" set. There's currently a red "Classic" bucket on the shelves of many stores that costs $10 and contains 400 pieces. The "Star-Wars in a Bucket" set contains less (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | How 2 Augment RIS 1.5?
|
|
I need to augment RIS 1.5 with more Lego components, sometimes to build a temporary stand and sometimes as part of a robotic concept. Lego S@H and Dacta let you buy specific parts, but perhaps just a set of toy blocks would be as good at a lower (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | anyone got a CueCat?
|
|
I was over on /. weighing in on the current controversy over Digital Convergence's CueCat barcode scanner and their current legal fiasco over some Linux developers creating an open-source driver and the accompanying high-speed crosscheck it (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | hi
|
|
hi and hello i m a newbee on the list, i m working with the lego robotic invention system. i was really surprised how much work was done on thi system from several people. i mtrying to get my robot as wireless as possible, and also the ir connection (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Modelling boolean gates with trains
|
|
(...) If NOT is reversing direction, than 1 is forward and 0 is back. (Or the other way around; whatever.) But I'd be curious to hear how you envision more complicated logic! (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.edu, lugnet.trains)
|
|
 | | RE: R: good sets?
|
|
Heh, heh. I'm at my office ... with my Lego robotics stuff. :Þ Doug Wilcox Senior Web Developer iMcKesson Provider Solutions Group-Needham 160 Gould Street, Suite 130 Needham, MA 02494-2308 Phone: 781.453.2900 x 237 Fax: 781.455.7990 e-mail: (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Modelling boolean gates with trains
|
|
If by 1 your mean TRUE and by 0 you mean FALSE, and given that in Boolean logic TRUE = NOT FALSE, then two conclusions from what you have said is "train on the line" = "reversed" "train not on the line" and "train not on the line = "reversed" "train (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: Lego Mindstorms in Swedish television
|
|
(...) Or their website: (URL) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Modelling boolean gates with trains
|
|
Okay, this might be totally impossible (or insane or banal), but has anyone modelled boolean functions on a train layout (System or Duplo)? At the moment I'm thinking "train on the line"=1, "not on the line"=0. NOT could be done by reversing the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.edu, lugnet.trains)
|