Subject:
|
Re: Stereo Vision
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:04:42 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Laurentino Martins <lmartins@/ihatespam/marktest.pt>
|
Viewed:
|
3434 times
|
| |
|
|
This approach has several problems.
One is that the left image will show you smaller objects than the right, because the light travels a greater distance.
The second is that precision is very important and the mirrors must be fixed otherwise will make the image tremble a lot.
If you want to subtract two almost identical images to see the edges like I want to, one pixel of unalignment is too much.
Sorry the english
At 00:38 11-08-2000 Friday, Doug Weathers wrote:
> You might be able to save yourself some trouble with mirrors if you mount
> the camera to one side instead of in the middle.
>
> . .
> \ . \ .
> \....\ .
> \ . \ .
> . .
> ##### <-- camera lens
Laurentino Martins
[ mailto:lau@netcabo.pt ]
[ http://www.terravista.pt/Enseada/2808/ ]
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Stereo Vision
|
| Hi As you may know my current project has everything to do with image recognition. I was reading one tread in this newsgroup and suddenly it struck me that many of the problems I currently have in finding the contours of the objects can be overcome (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
45 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
