Subject:
|
Re: O'Reilly book news
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Apr 2000 01:06:49 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@spamlessMATTDM.ORG
|
Highlighted:
|
!
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
3794 times
|
| |
|
|
Dave Baum <dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com> wrote:
> they used an associate link, they'd get a little extra income. From
> their perspective, why not take advantage of a little free money?
I agree with Suzanne -- it looks shoddy and unprofessional. I don't think
it's immoral or anything, but it puts them on the same psychological level
as some random person with a geocities page full of banner ads.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: O'Reilly book news
|
| (...) Yeah! -- Well said! Here's what was going through my mind (and mouth :) when Suzanne showed me the page[1] earlier today: Suz: "Check this out...you're gonna love this..." (sarcasm) Todd: (seeing page on screen) "Ahh, [expletive deleted] cool (...) (25 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | Re: O'Reilly book news
|
| (...) I also agree about how it looks...which is basically why I don't use an associate link on the NQC site (1). Dave (1) Acutally, I even debated about putting anything at all on the NQC site about my book. (25 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: O'Reilly book news
|
| (...) I hope people don't get too worked up about all of this. I assume TLC decided to put links on their site, then someone had the idea that if they used an associate link, they'd get a little extra income. From their perspective, why not take (...) (25 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
45 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
