Subject:
|
Re: Battle Bots?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Jan 2000 04:21:25 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
nospam-dcchen@pacbellSTOPSPAM.net-nospam
|
Viewed:
|
2587 times
|
| |
|
|
I tried to organize one in the Los Angeles area. Even had rules set up
per Nate Burgess. See URL: http://www.azimuthmedia.com/RobotArena/
No one signed up. Would be willing to try again though.
Dave
Patrick Hayes wrote:
>
> > BUT when i put the idea forward many of the people involved basically
> > said that they did not want to enter a RCX battle bot type event for
> > fear of having their very expensive RCX broken. or for that matter any
> > lego broken. in one pic you can see a pic of an all lego multi-battery
> > box hammer.
>
> They complained about maybe having a ten-cent chunk of plastic break? Come
> on, people, they're Legos! People who do _real_ BattleBots often spend
> $5-10,000 of their own money and ridiculous amounts of time on a single
> robot, and they _know_ that most of it will be broken. I hope to
> participate in it myself, price be damned (assuming my wife doesn't disagree
> ;-) It's coming up with a good design and finding time to build it that's
> proven to be the hardest part). RCX is practically free when it comes to
> robotics. After all, it's a cheaper variation on what fischerTechnik has
> long been: a way to prototype robots in a _disposable_ way. That's why I
> love them.
>
> Patrick Hayes
> Programmer, inventor, composer, and mad scientist ;-)
>
> Insert flames here:
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Battle Bots?
|
| (...) They complained about maybe having a ten-cent chunk of plastic break? Come on, people, they're Legos! People who do _real_ BattleBots often spend $5-10,000 of their own money and ridiculous amounts of time on a single robot, and they _know_ (...) (27 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
