 | | Re: another comparison
|
|
(...) 1. The DFT certainly may be considered as overkill for a toy robot kit. But I am not sure that this forum considers the RCX or NXT only as toys. To say that NXT or RCX are not made for this or that is like saying to the inventor of the pencil (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: This is the cancer that is killing Lugnet (Was Re: Apology)
|
|
(...) Actually, I think that whilst some parts are getting worse - other parts are getting much better. I'd hold up Wikipedia as a shining example of how the Internet has become a much better place than it once was. The idea that the whole of human (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: another comparison
|
|
Chris Phillips wrote on Sunday, January 21, 2007 7:38 AM "My gut tells me that the RCX (using BrickOS) would give the NXT (using anything available so far) a good run for its money, though..." Once you reach a certain base performance level, then (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: This is the cancer that is killing Lugnet (Was Re: Apology)
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) 'Cause you know, inserting a little levity to make an otherwise argumentative thread a little brighter never helps. (is the sarcasm filter not working??) Lessons learned? Some people want to get in the last snipe, even after all (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: another comparison
|
|
(...) Perhaps a good benchmark would be to write a PID controller and measure the number of control loop iterations per second that can be achieved under each environment. This incorporates sensor input with motor output, and uses a moderate amount (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
