 | | Re: Pneumatic Quadraped 242
|
|
(...) Thanks Tobbe! (...) How would turntables help the design? Right now the whole thing is studless except for the feet. To use the studly turntables would require major framework redesign (not that that is a bad thing :^) You are right it is not (...) (22 years ago, 24-Nov-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.build, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatic Quadraped 242
|
|
(...) Cool! Would it benefit from turntables between the feet and legs? These turntable 2 x 2: (URL) these turntable 4 x 4: (URL) like it looses alot of traction, perhaps if the foot could remain more still it would be better? (22 years ago, 24-Nov-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.build, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatic Quadraped 242
|
|
Thanks, Kevin, quadraped explanations are very interesting, and you sequencer paper is a "must read" !!! Philo (22 years ago, 24-Nov-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.build, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | ERIKA 1.2 available for download...
|
|
ERIKA 1.2 available for download! This version includes: - enhanced infrared support (single and multi-byte send!) - infrared transmission bugfix - PWM support now can be installed on timers T80/T81 depending on thefeatures (notes, IR transmission) (...) (22 years ago, 24-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Pneumatic Quadraped 242
|
|
I got a new web site with plenty of room, so I've uploaded Quad242 movies. The website is (URL) As usual, my creations are listed in chronological order, so Quad242 ((URL) is at the end of the creation list. There are movies for walking forward and (...) (22 years ago, 24-Nov-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.build, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: usb problem
|
|
I don't use Linux, right now I am using Windows XP. -----Original Message----- From: h.gokmen@btinternet.com [mailto:h.gokmen@bti...ernet.com] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 4:20 AM To: rfkrakora@insightbb.com; lego-robotics@crynwr.com Subject: (...) (22 years ago, 22-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Are there GOTO statements in NQC?
|
|
Thanks to you all, who have commented my imaginations. The most veto comes from alex: (...) The statement does not contain the logical error you see. Ok, ok, i should have written "subroutine" (or method) instead of program. So your are right. (...) (...) (22 years ago, 22-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Trains, DCC, and pbForth
|
|
(...) DOH! Of course. In the fire alarm business, we have a three state voltage out to the sensors. Usually the Vout is 24V and the device can respond when the voltage falls to 5 V. The devices have a power supply that is basically a big cap and a (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Trains, DCC, and pbForth
|
|
(...) From what I've read, most DCC layouts have a separate small programming track anyways. This way a loco can be safely programmed without having to remove all the other locos from the layout[1]. So, you could hook output A of the RCX to the (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Trains, DCC, and pbForth
|
|
(...) Yes, sounds like fun! And, that DZ123 I recently posted about would be ideal for the job. I think I'll have to order one or two more to test this out. One change to LDCC that would help facilitate this would be the ability to configure LDCC to (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth, FTX)
|
