|
|
 | | Re: A Generic Idea
|
| Yes, I think the point isn't whether or not the robot has enough oomph to recognize faces or things like that :D The point is that you can do a *lotta* fun stuff with a camera or mike in a robot, if ONLY you could give the RCX a link to something (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: A Generic Idea
|
| (...) To clarify, I should say that the software with the cam would probably not even install on a PPC, since it doesn't even install on XP... (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: 8475 Motor Tests
|
| (...) Yes, I did too. Judging from the performance of the RC car, you'd think the motors would be equivalent to perhaps 8, or more, of the geared 9V motors. The buggy can really zip along! There was one other thing about my test. When the 9252 motor (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: 8475 Motor Tests
|
| This is interesting information, thanks TJ. I must say that I got the visual impression that the buggy motors seemed to have more than a mere 2 - 3 times more shaft power output than the gear motors. The little piece of data which would add greatly (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: A Generic Idea
|
| Steve (...) Under anything after Windows 95? Nope. In fact, only Win3.1 programs running under Win95 can do it easily. Win3.1 programs running under Win98 onwards can't talk to the parallel port at all easily. If you must do it, use PortTalk - a (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
