|
 | | Re: hovercraft
|
| (...) did you remove the "nospam_", well now it's real mailto:s.mientki@mailbox.kun.nl Stef (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
| |  | | Re: hovercraft
|
| Pure Lego propellors: I just tried using vehicle windshields as rotor blades. They actually work quite well. Their slope is extremely steep - but I guess that's what you want for small diameter propellors (ie a smaller hole in the top of your (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| |  | | Re: hovercraft
|
| For people who are interested in chasing this goal, it would be interesting if people would post the weight (or mass - if you have a handy massometer :-) of your contraption - along with it's 'floor area' and the total 'skirt perimeter' length. (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| |  | | Re: Line following algorithms
|
| (...) Well I suppose this statement applies to me since I have organized an event that limits the robots to a single light sensor. However, in my defense, I must say that the intent behind the rule was to make the game more fair for all competitors. (...) (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| |  | | Re: hovercraft
|
| (...) <snip> (...) Very nicely done! I tried the 8475 motors with the ZNAP props and it didn't generate a good enough force of air. Back to the drawing board! Keep up the great work! Dave K (23 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
| |