 | | Re: Re: Scheduler patch
|
|
(...) Thanks for the link, your solution of proportional timeslicing is more straightforward than mine which I like. The only downside would be that a high prioritized process would have it's wakeup conditions checked less frequently than a low (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Intervista su BimP
|
|
Sorry, the message is in Italian because it was addressed to lugnet.loc.it. Didn't realize I was on the .robotics ng when I clickked the New button... Mario "Mario Ferrari" <mario.ferrari@edis.it> ha scritto: (...) su (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: anyone know how to check free space on RCX?
|
|
kenneth, I believe the code you are looking for is used in program.c (for LegOS v0.2.6) When you press the View button (with no program running) LegOS will show you "FREE", press again, you will get the most significant portion of the free memory (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Navigation using landmarks (Was: Re: lasers and RCX)
|
|
(...) When I said "three degrees of freedom" - I didn't mean "X-Y-Z", I mean't X, Y and Rotation-about-Z. Whilst (in theory) a Killough platform moves in X and Y only - they do rotate a little in practice. (...) From reading the specifications for (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Navigation using landmarks (Was: Re: lasers and RCX)
|
|
(...) I don't think anyone has actually *tried* this yet - but it's still worth discussing the *other* issues since we wouldn't want to go to the hassle of ripping apart mice until it's evident that it *could* work. The data stream from the mouse is (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
