 | | *** name poll: make your votes reminder ***
|
|
This is a reminder for all of you who have not voted for the new legOS name. Now is YOUR turn. I've collected the names and present them at the end of this posting. You can vote for ONE ( 1 ) name. Send an eMail to legOS-namepoll@gmx.de with: - the (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RE: optical mouse chips as vision sensors?
|
|
And then check out the language he used to hack into the mouse data stream....yep it's FORTH. Not surprising as New Micros Inc was one of the first vendors of single board computers with Forth as the control language... Cheers, Ralph (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Navigation using landmarks (Was: Re: lasers and RCX)
|
|
I'm certain that the optics need to be insanely close to the surface they are monitoring, causing a clearance problem. If such a device was hacked, would placing it in the center of a synchro or Killough platform prove useless in a spin? Rob (...) (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: How do I switch other devices with my RCX.
|
|
(...) It all depends on what you want to switch, maybe you should explain your prject a bit more. Jürgen (23 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: optical mouse chips as vision sensors?
|
|
check out (URL) Boyes <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag: 5.1.0.14.2.200206291...ion.com... (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: pbForth vs RCX 1.0
|
|
(...) What you describe would work exactly. Normally, the "outer interpreter" of pbForth waits for input using "KEY" - which of course is just a char from the IR. You can make a special word that waits for anything you like... Cheers, Ralph (23 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: kits on sale - Toronto area
|
|
Laura, I picked up two rotation sensors and the Vision COmmand as well as a few other kits - just in case. I really wish you would keep this kind of bargain hunting to yourself :-) Cheers, Ralph (23 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: CPR for RCX?
|
|
(...) You're pretty much OK until point 4. TCL is used to compile the pseudo code for pbFOrth into assembler source code. From there the GNU as program assembled the object code and ld links it and eventually produces the S records. S records are (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: Linux driver for USB tower
|
|
(...) Richard, this is great! What device name does the new tower driver use. I hope to be able to use my Tcl/Tk GUI for this purpose. It would be really great to get USB support for pbForth into the Linux world. The serial port has always been (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | FW: pbForth vs RCX 1.0
|
|
-----Original Message----- From: rhempel@bmts.com [mailto:rhempel@bmts.com] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:21 AM To: Mario Ferrari; lugnet.robotics.rcx....lugnet.com Cc: rhempel@bmts.com Subject: Re: pbForth vs RCX 1.0 Can RCX 2.0 communicate with (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
