 | | Re: Motorized landing gear question
|
|
(...) (These are identical to Mindstorms motors - right? Certainly the motors *I* picked up from Znaps sets are indistinguishable from Mindstorms motors ...I don't think they ever shipped a different one with Znaps.) (...) Well, the worm gear should (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Motorized landing gear question
|
|
(...) I'd suggest it's not necessary for the landing gear to lift the craft - just to hold it up. If it's only operated while there's no weight on the craft, it becomes much easier, you only need some kind of locking mechanism so the motor isn't (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.space, lugnet.znap)
|
| |
| | Re: multiplexor and legOS
|
|
(...) Not bad. But as you say, still vulnerable to the task switching problem. (...) Instead of resorting to that, maybe there is a way to freeze task switching during critical operations. When I owned and programmed the AmigaOS (don't laugh :), (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Motorized landing gear question
|
|
I've been pondering using one of the Znap motors to power a landing gear mechanism strong enough to at least hold, if not lift a decent sized space craft (including the motor and battery box- if possible) Any ideas? I was thinking worm gear and some (...) (23 years ago, 5-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.space, lugnet.znap)
|
| |
| | Re: multiplexor and legOS
|
|
#include <sys/time.h> void systime_set_timeslice (unsigned char slice); include/sys/time.h:43-45: #ifdef CONF_TM #define TM_DEFAULT_SLICE 20 file://!< default multitasking timeslice #endif hope that helps, Albert "Michael J Ash" (...) (23 years ago, 4-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
