To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.reviewsOpen lugnet.reviews in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Reviews / 216 (-10)
  Re: My favorite Adventurer sets
 
In lugnet.adventurers, Joseph Gonzalez writes: {{SNIP}} (...) Here I have a question NOT for the still pure of faith <grin>: Have you (or anyone) attempted 'surgery' via Dremel tool (or similar) to actually make a zepp out of this blimp? I make the (...) (25 years ago, 21-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.reviews)
 
  My favorite Adventurer sets
 
I'm really enjoying the Adventurer's theme (though the '98 sets are considerably better than the '99 sets in my opinion). Here are the top models (again in my opinion): 5909 - Treasure Raiders Really just a minifig pack but the biplane and car are (...) (25 years ago, 21-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.reviews)
 
  Insectoids - better than I thought, Rock Raiders - disappointment
 
I had only bought the 6909-Sonic Stinger but just picked up the 6919-Planetary Prowler (at a discount price) and I find myself liking the Insectoids sub-theme more than I thought I would. I'm seriously looking at picking up more of the sets on (...) (25 years ago, 21-Sep-99, to lugnet.space, lugnet.reviews, lugnet.underground)
 
  Re: Review: 8286 3-in-1 car
 
(...) Good review. You were right on in your assessment of the mechanicals and building of the set--it's not at all complicated mechanically, but it shows the builder a *lot* of different building techniques. Steve (25 years ago, 20-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.reviews)
 
  Re: Review: 8286 3-in-1 car
 
Ka-On Lee wrote in message ... (...) 15 (...) set (...) Hmm, a chance to contribute. I will try to do a review of the 8445, I am also interested in hearing other peoples thoughts on this kit. I was both happy with and disapointed with it, I will try (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.reviews)
 
  Re: Review of 'Classic Train'?
 
Yup, if you mean 3225, I posted a review and it is earlier in this very group. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
 
  Review of 'Classic Train'?
 
Does anyone have a review of this set? It's int he latest S@H catalog, and while I'm not really a trainhead, this one looks pretty cool. Comments? (I don't mind that it doesn't come with track or a speed regulator. I don't have the space to set it (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
 
  Review: 8286 3-in-1 car
 
Ok here is my first post to Lugnet. It is the first technic set I get in 15 years and it is my first review, so please forgive me for any mistakes. :) Also I tend to be harsh when rating my LEGO sets. I haven't seen a LEGO set that I would call it (...) (25 years ago, 18-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.reviews)
 
  Re: Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
 
Jeff Johnston wrote in message <37D07585.A947B4B5@m...ne.net>... (...) Actually, the biggest raised base plate I'm aware of is the 48x48 base plate in 5808 (there is one annoying thing about this plate, it has two rounded corners, with a radius of (...) (25 years ago, 15-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
 
  Re: Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
 
(...) Troy, I think you're referring to 6097, Night Lord's Castle, as opposed to the other one Scott was talking about, 6090 Royal Knight's Castle. Bryan (25 years ago, 5-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR