To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.reviewsOpen lugnet.reviews in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Reviews / *211 (-5)
  Re: Review of 'Classic Train'?
 
Yup, if you mean 3225, I posted a review and it is earlier in this very group. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
 
  Review of 'Classic Train'?
 
Does anyone have a review of this set? It's int he latest S@H catalog, and while I'm not really a trainhead, this one looks pretty cool. Comments? (I don't mind that it doesn't come with track or a speed regulator. I don't have the space to set it (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
 
  Review: 8286 3-in-1 car
 
Ok here is my first post to Lugnet. It is the first technic set I get in 15 years and it is my first review, so please forgive me for any mistakes. :) Also I tend to be harsh when rating my LEGO sets. I haven't seen a LEGO set that I would call it (...) (25 years ago, 18-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.reviews)
 
  Re: Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
 
Jeff Johnston wrote in message <37D07585.A947B4B5@m...ne.net>... (...) Actually, the biggest raised base plate I'm aware of is the 48x48 base plate in 5808 (there is one annoying thing about this plate, it has two rounded corners, with a radius of (...) (25 years ago, 15-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
 
  Re: Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
 
(...) Troy, I think you're referring to 6097, Night Lord's Castle, as opposed to the other one Scott was talking about, 6090 Royal Knight's Castle. Bryan (25 years ago, 5-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR