|
|
 | | Re: taking good photos
|
| If you don't have alternative flash solutions there's a trick, put a small piece a transparent (Scotch) tape over the flash lens, it acts as a little diffuser and cost ~$0.000001. Maybe even a smear of some vaseline on the flash lens would work (I'm (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.publish.photography)
| | | | | Re: taking good photos
|
| (...) Ah, but that only works if you've got hand-held flashes. Not all cameras have that capability (I know mine doesn't). So, to be more accurate, never use the built-in flash to photograph LEGO bricks. If you can set up a flash source that's not (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.publish.photography)
| | | | | Re: taking good photos
|
| (...) Yeah, I'll second that. The GIMP rocks. John -- GIMP is the GNU Image Manipulation Program. (URL) (23 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)
| | | | | Re: taking good photos
|
| (...) ^^^^^^ Err, I mean a 48-bit image (16 bits per channel) (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish.photography)
| | | | | Re: taking good photos
|
| (...) Unless you know what you're doing. In which case: nothing beats flashes -- not even the sun.[1] --Todd [1] Yup, high-power strobe flashes are even brighter than the sun. Try making a 1/1000 second exposure at f/22 or f/32 from sunlight! And (...) (23 years ago, 21-May-03, to lugnet.publish.photography)
|
|
