|
|
 | | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
| (...) Here's a link to the review from Steve's Digicams. (URL) in the market for a Digital Camera will want to check out the reviews there: it is my first stop when looking for a new camera. The review does note a macro-mode (close-up) of 1.6 (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.publish.photography)
| | | | | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
| (...) Well, whatever it is Troy is using, here is a picture of it as well as a picture of how it pictures-- (URL) C. (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.space)
| | | | | RE: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
| (...) Actually, I have the 990, which is one model earlier than the 995. Troy is using a Canon EOS D10 these days. I'm quite happy with all the features on my camera...manual/automatic focus, f-stop, shutter speed, white balance, flash, etc. The (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
| (...) Bram, as well as Troy Cefaratti, both have the Coolpix 995, and I have the Coolpix 4500 (which is basically the 995's followup). They're the split-body design, and I love my camera dearly. They are more mid-to top of the line than the camera (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: Nikon CoolPix 2100 Rating?
|
| "Aaron Muhl" <Aaron_Muhl@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:HDu527.oEJ@lugnet.com... (...) camera (...) Don't use it but I know Bram uses a Coolpix camera. He's been a bit un-Lugnet lately due to school (so he most likely won't see this) but you might (...) (23 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.space)
|
|
