| |
In lugnet.publish.brickjournal, Calum Tsang wrote:
| |
In lugnet.publish.brickjournal, Kevin Blocksidge wrote:
| |
You should work on the picture quality, though. You need to get higher-res
pictures in many cases.
|
I suspect during PDF export they were crunched to save file space. For those
of us hosting mirrors this is a good thing! :)
I’m sure the print version is much clearer.
Calum
|
Calum is indeed correct. We built the magazine using professional printing
software (Adobe InDesign) at a full 300dpi for 8.5 x 11. Needless to say, that
download is over 100 Mb.
As for all the other comments here, thank you so much. We are very excited about
this as well. And believe me when I say all of the suggestions above have been
brought up before. We decided to work on the magazine itself though and get a
good finished product. Please keep the feedback coming.
Geoff Gray - Brickjournal Staffer
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A new project...
|
| (...) Awesome stuff! One suggestion, coming from someone who works in a copy center. I think this would be better if it were formatted for 8-1/2x11 paper instead of 11x17 paper. This would make printing out a copy a lot easier. Russell BayLUG/BayLTC (20 years ago, 22-Jun-05, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A new project...
|
| (...) I suspect during PDF export they were crunched to save file space. For those of us hosting mirrors this is a good thing! :) I'm sure the print version is much clearer. Calum (20 years ago, 22-Jun-05, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal, FTX)
|
58 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
