Subject:
|
Re: URL Style (was Re: New box cars)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Sep 1999 17:08:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
563 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999 03:08:48 GMT, Sproaticus <jsproat@io.com> wrote:
> I like either one. I'm more concerned about ramifications about having two
> completely different URLs for each page, though. It could have interesting
> effects with caching and bookmarks if you're not careful. Figure out which
> you will use and never use the other one.
Good point about the caching. I was thinking about that yesterday, as I
was testing the domain-only version of the URL, and traversing my pages. A
glance at the browser's URL display confirmed that nothing was
back-translating the URL. Which is even more cool.
Luckily, nearly all the internal links are relative, so they wouldn't be
affected if I switch. Unluckily, nearly all the internal links are
relative, so I'd have to track down and update the links which are
absolute.
Or the absolute links could be switched to relative, if href=".." is
allowed.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: URL Style (was Re: New box cars)
|
| (...) I don't know if it's allowed (shame on me :-) but it works, by using the baseURL value (implied or specified). HREF=".." will try to fetch the default doc for the parent directory. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 9-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: URL Style (was Re: New box cars)
|
| (...) I confused myself and got my hopes up, until I realized this is an ATT.NET thing, which won't necessarily work with my page. Testing...nope. IO.COM makes its customers pay for virtual domains. (...) I like either one. I'm more concerned about (...) (25 years ago, 9-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
