Subject:
|
Re: Image Maps
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Mon, 6 Sep 1999 05:37:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
392 times
|
| |
|
|
Woo hoo! Thanks Bram!
LINC
Bram Lambrecht wrote
> > From what I understand a Client side processing requires
> > the browser to interpret the image map (are there browsers still
> > around that don't do this?).
>
> Correct. I think Netscape 1.1 or maybe 2.0 already supported client-side
> maps.
>
> > The server side processing uses a script on the server somewhere.
>
> Correct again. I don't think it's really necessary to do this. It
> doesn't work as nicely as client-side maps either, because instead of
> seeing a URL in the status bar when you roll over the image with the
> mouse, you see pixel coordinates.
>
> > I made a client side image map,
> > and I seemed to have produced HTML code... of which I cut out the
> > bit I wanted
> >
> > <IMG SRC="cover_lable.gif" ALT="" USEMAP="#cover_lable"></A>
> > <MAP NAME="cover_lable">
> > <AREA SHAPE=RECT COORDS="97,113,286,136" HREF=mailto:linc@bulkley.net
> > ALT=""></AREA>
> > </MAP>
>
> That's all you need. To turn off the border, add BORDER=0 to the <IMG>
> tag.
> --Bram
>
>
> Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com
> -------------------oooo-----(_)-----oooo-------------------
> WWW: http://www.chuh.org/Students/Bram-Lambrecht/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Image Maps
|
| (...) Correct. I think Netscape 1.1 or maybe 2.0 already supported client-side maps. (...) Correct again. I don't think it's really necessary to do this. It doesn't work as nicely as client-side maps either, because instead of seeing a URL in the (...) (25 years ago, 6-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
