| | Mens' magazines Amy Hughes
|
| | I've had two "mens' magazines" ask me for hi-res pictures of my church. They seem to assume I'll be delighted with the request. One offered monetary compensation, the other apparently thought I'd be so delighted they'd just offer copies of the (...) (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Mens' magazines Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) To make fun of us all in a snide way, would be my guess, if it's the sort of mags I'm thinking of... (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Mens' magazines John Gerlach
|
| | | | | | (...) Or as a 'feature' of women with odd hobbies... Not that *we* think it's odd, of course!! (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Mens' magazines Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Need we assume that their intent is to mock, though? I recall seeing the LEGO-compatible Tyco Superblocks Phone (as shown (URL)) in a "cool stuff" column in Playboy about fifteen years ago. In that article, the phone was quite highly (and (...) (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Re: Mens' magazines John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Hmmm. Perhaps a little diversification? : (URL) Perversion knows no boundaries. JOHN (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Mens' magazines Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Could be worse--Amy could have been approached by (URL) The National Review.> Now that's perverse! Dave! FUT: OT.fun (because I don't intend my jest to start a big debate) (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Re: Mens' magazines Jules Pitt
|
| | | | (...) My guess is that they wanted the picture for one of those mundane pieces on marriage that both Women's and Men's magazines do all the time. I figure they'd photoshop in a minifig bride and groom and have a novel illustration. Just my (...) (21 years ago, 14-Nov-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |