 | | Re: // and ** vs {} and [] (was: testing in rtl...) —William R. Ward
|
| | | (...) What NNTP server do you use? I was under the impression that it was written in Perl itself. [...] (...) How about a different interpretation - // and ** (and don't forget __ for underlining) might not be interpreted the same as the {} and [] (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: // and ** vs {} and [] (was: testing in rtl...) — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) CNews. (...) Doesn't that look a bit redundant? /italics/ and *boldface* What do underlined underlines look like? Like this?-- _N_ew _E_ngland _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup Not sure how either any of those are an improvement. --Todd (22 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: // and ** vs {} and [] (was: testing in rtl...) —William R. Ward
|
| | | | (...) I see. With extensive modifications, I assume? I'm sure there's a way to link libperl.so to CNews but that could be unweildy to say the least. (...) Sorry I can't view the FTX results of that on my browser. But I assume that's right. (...) I (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | |
