 | | Re: One upside of the whole folder moderation mess....
|
|
(...) Is now. I just walked your whole folder tree, it should all be clear to view. That PB4Y-2 is huge. Very cool. I gotta go to bed though. (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: One upside of the whole folder moderation mess....
|
|
(...) That's cool! The "Meeting the SNOT team" pictures look awfully familiar, I think they were photographed at Holger's old apartment in Moenchengladbach. I've been there! :-) (URL) isn't reviewed yet, though, so only Larry and the other (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
I'd just like to say again that if you (Kevin) need more free, good, help you have four ready willing and able people here. -- Thanx~ Nicole (URL) Loch" <kloch@opnsys.com> wrote in message news:GyECpE.9oM@lugnet.com... (...) structure (...) with (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) I'm actually using IE but I'll check out Mozilla... (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) Don't you wish all software development was this efficient? It's even written in C. Kids, don't try this at home :) BTW, you are using Mozilla 1.1a right? Besides being a far superior browser to IE or NS it has a fortuitous bug where it (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | One upside of the whole folder moderation mess....
|
|
is that you get to stumble into the most amazing things. After every 10 or so folders of bionicle MOCS that are poorly photographed, you find a reward. For instance this folder tree, which I found by reviewing one of the magazine article subfolders (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) It used to do that, but now the Off Topic link also sets moderation level -1 (the same as Unsure) so it will disappear from the regular moderator page. (...) -5 is temporary while thumbnails are being generated -2 is Unsafe -1 is Unsure 0 is (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) That border line helps a LOT!!!! But is it recursive? That would be best, if there is one unmoderated folder in there somewhere, it's still "unsure" and you need to go drilling. (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) Cool. Now what happens to the ones that are off topic? Previously the off topic keyword seemed to just get added one more time each time you pressed it but the folder would (randomly) keep reappearing until you said it was safe Also what is (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) Boy, you guys are tough to please! You are right though, everyone, not just moderators should be able to tell that a subfolder is unmoderated. The right thing to do is have an "unmoderated" icon, but as a quick hack, unmoderated folders now (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) OOOH, good idea. I did not think of that. I guess I better go install NS then, do you have a recommendation for a good and stable and free version? Meanwhile the elves have been steadily improving the interface while I was working (I just (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) Try running two browsers - e.g. one Netscape and one IE. Since they have separate cookie jars, you shouldn't need to log in and out. --Bill. (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) It's harder than I thought! For people with deeply nested folder structure it is hard to tell what HAS and what has NOT been cleared yet. I found myself logging out to check then logging back in a lot... (this was with James Mathis, Eric I (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) Wow! Thanks! I am busily clearing Eric Sophie's whole tree as we speak. (had to start somewhere, why not there) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) Wow! I just wanted to send a big thank you to the people moderating. I'm impressed that that many have already been processed. I'd also be happy to volunteer to help moderate. Bruce (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) You can now do that. You will now also see empty folders, as those need to be moderated too. Current moderation stats: 2537 out of 15634 folders moderated. KL (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) sorry, my mistake. I thought you set it up to select from the oldest first, so that the backlog will eventually diminish...? Dan (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) Actually, the randomness is only to reduce the change of multiple moderators working on the same folder. The subset of folders that are randomized is selected from the newest folders. That way new stuff and old stuff get moderated. KL (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf
|
|
(...) Yes, moderation happens at the folder level. Add one or more pictures to a new or existing folder and it seems to mark the folder as needing review. (...) I do not think we have the power to MOVE pictures from folder to folder. All we can do (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf
|
|
(...) I remember "calling shenanigans" from South Park, but not hijinx. --Bill. FUT: lugnet.off-topic.fun (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
