To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.publishOpen lugnet.publish in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Publishing / 3514 (-20)
  One upside of the whole folder moderation mess....
 
is that you get to stumble into the most amazing things. After every 10 or so folders of bionicle MOCS that are poorly photographed, you find a reward. For instance this folder tree, which I found by reviewing one of the magazine article subfolders (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)  
 
  Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
 
(...) It used to do that, but now the Off Topic link also sets moderation level -1 (the same as Unsure) so it will disappear from the regular moderator page. (...) -5 is temporary while thumbnails are being generated -2 is Unsafe -1 is Unsure 0 is (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
 
(...) That border line helps a LOT!!!! But is it recursive? That would be best, if there is one unmoderated folder in there somewhere, it's still "unsure" and you need to go drilling. (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
 
(...) Cool. Now what happens to the ones that are off topic? Previously the off topic keyword seemed to just get added one more time each time you pressed it but the folder would (randomly) keep reappearing until you said it was safe Also what is (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
 
(...) Boy, you guys are tough to please! You are right though, everyone, not just moderators should be able to tell that a subfolder is unmoderated. The right thing to do is have an "unmoderated" icon, but as a quick hack, unmoderated folders now (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
 
(...) OOOH, good idea. I did not think of that. I guess I better go install NS then, do you have a recommendation for a good and stable and free version? Meanwhile the elves have been steadily improving the interface while I was working (I just (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
 
(...) Try running two browsers - e.g. one Netscape and one IE. Since they have separate cookie jars, you shouldn't need to log in and out. --Bill. (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
 
(...) It's harder than I thought! For people with deeply nested folder structure it is hard to tell what HAS and what has NOT been cleared yet. I found myself logging out to check then logging back in a lot... (this was with James Mathis, Eric I (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
 
(...) Wow! Thanks! I am busily clearing Eric Sophie's whole tree as we speak. (had to start somewhere, why not there) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
 
(...) Wow! I just wanted to send a big thank you to the people moderating. I'm impressed that that many have already been processed. I'd also be happy to volunteer to help moderate. Bruce (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
 
(...) You can now do that. You will now also see empty folders, as those need to be moderated too. Current moderation stats: 2537 out of 15634 folders moderated. KL (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
 
(...) sorry, my mistake. I thought you set it up to select from the oldest first, so that the backlog will eventually diminish...? Dan (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
 
(...) Actually, the randomness is only to reduce the change of multiple moderators working on the same folder. The subset of folders that are randomized is selected from the newest folders. That way new stuff and old stuff get moderated. KL (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Brickshelf
 
(...) Yes, moderation happens at the folder level. Add one or more pictures to a new or existing folder and it seems to mark the folder as needing review. (...) I do not think we have the power to MOVE pictures from folder to folder. All we can do (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Brickshelf
 
(...) I remember "calling shenanigans" from South Park, but not hijinx. --Bill. FUT: lugnet.off-topic.fun (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Brickshelf
 
(...) Ok, so the moderators can see what folder a picture was uploaded to? That is a good thing! And they can move it from one folder to another? If so - COOL! I am happy about this! But I saw the picture I linked to in another part of this thread (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Brickshelf
 
(...) I don't have all the details and I'd rather Kevin himself answered if he has time. That said apparently someone uploaded porn. Again. (this isn't the first incident) Kevin had set up a system for post review so that anyone with moderator login (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Brickshelf
 
Calling hi-jinx is. .... well I don't really know what it means. I think it came from a South Park episode. My employees have been using it for a while so I started using it. I read the thread I didn't see anything that explained why he was taking (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Brickshelf
 
(...) Maybe I missed something, but the only statement of explanation I've seen is: (...) By itself, I don't think this is an explanation. Other free web sites don't have moderation. Not that I'm saying Kevin shouldn't do it (though it would be nice (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Brickshelf
 
(...) While I have no idea what "call hi-jinx" means (Is it like a spell cast or something?) I think it's *been* explained already. To my satisfaction, anyway. Read the entire thread, it's not that big. It's not clear to me that having "kids get (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR