Subject:
|
Re: Couldn't resist bringing this to your attention(s)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 21:40:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1538 times
|
| |
|
|
"Thomas Avery" <thomas.avery@intec-hou.com> writes:
> In lugnet.publish, William R. Ward writes:
> > "Steven lane" <steveroblane@aol.com> writes:
> > > http://brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=14672
> >
> > Isn't the foul language used in this a violation of Brickshelf's ToS?
>
> Since when is "c**p" considered foul language? I recall that term being used
> quite a bit here on Lugnet. I take it to mean "garbage" or "rubbish".
It *is* a dirty word, though not on the FCC's infamous list. It is a
slang term for feces, which is clearly inappropriate. BTW, Repeating
it here probably violates LUGNET's ToS, so I replaced two letters in
your quoted text with **.
> As for violating the TOS, I'm not sure. I don't think it does. But I also
> think it's inappropriate because it's an opinion and not a Lego creation.
Fine with me.
--Bill.
--
William R Ward bill@wards.net http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Couldn't resist bringing this to your attention(s)
|
| (...) Since when is "crap" considered foul language? I recall that term being used quite a bit here on Lugnet. I take it to mean "garbage" or "rubbish". As for violating the TOS, I'm not sure. I don't think it does. But I also think it's (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
